Skip to main content

Priority Markers

Hal applies impact estimations & priority markers to active governance proposals (DIPs). The goal of these markers is to provide DGC Members, with an idea of how important it is that they pay attention to a given governance proposal in a given limited time.

Depending upon the magnitude of impact a governance proposal may have on Dijets; HAL can assign:

  1. Low
  2. Medium
  3. High

priority markers to active proposals and governance activities. HAL uses the following guidelines when assigning the priority markers:

Likely to be High Impact priority marker​

  • Anything that adds or removes a non-trivial amount of DJTX from the Treasury Wallet is likely to be marked as high impact.
  • Anything that permanently changes any of the existing governance processes or structures is likely to be marked as high impact.
  • Anything related to onboarding and offboarding sub-committee(s) is likely to be marked as high impact.
  • Anything DGC Members collectively vote to accept and execute for the first time is likely to be marked as high impact.

Likely to be Medium Impact priority marker​

  • Anything that adds or removes a trivial amount of money from the Treasury Wallet is likely to be marked as medium impact.
  • Proposals that may lead to later decisions that add or remove a non-trivial amount of DJTX from the Treasury Wallet is likely to be marked as medium impact.

Likely to be Low Impact priority marker​

  • Anything related to minor wording changes and/or fixes to existing DIPs are likely to be marked as low impact.